What Is Confirmation Bias, and How Does It Mislead Us?
Confirmation bias is the tendency to favour information that supports what we already believe and to overlook, reject or reinterpret conflicting evidence.
Topic
Material connected with reasoning tools.
Confirmation bias is the tendency to favour information that supports what we already believe and to overlook, reject or reinterpret conflicting evidence.
Not every claim needs the same amount of evidence. Everyday low-risk claims may reasonably be accepted provisionally, while extraordinary, consequential or highly specific claims require stronger and more independent support.
Many people accept claims because they come from a priest, scripture, politician, expert, parent, institution, tradition or majority. Authority can sometimes be useful, but authority by itself does not make a claim true.
Philosopher · 1872–1970 · Logic, philosophy, scepticism, public ethics
Bertrand Russell is important to Truth By Reason because he joined logic, scepticism, anti-dogmatism and public moral concern.
Philosopher · 1711–1776 · Philosophy, scepticism, empiricism
David Hume is important to Truth By Reason because he challenged weak claims about miracles, causation, religion and certainty through sceptical and empirical reasoning.
Philosopher · c. 470–399 BCE · Philosophy, questioning, ethics
Socrates is important to Truth By Reason because he represents disciplined questioning, the examination of assumptions, and the idea that untested beliefs may be dangerous.
Yes. A claim can be true even before humans prove it. But until there is enough evidence, we should not treat it as established knowledge.
Reality is what exists or is true whether or not we want it to be so. But humans also experience personal, social, symbolic and imagined realities that must be carefully distinguished.
Evidence supports or weakens a claim. Proof is a stronger standard where the evidence is sufficient to justify accepting the claim as established for a given purpose.
Many arguments fail because people use the same word in different ways. Truth By Reason needs careful definitions before conclusions.
Findings and Implications are separated so that the site does not confuse what appears true with what may follow if it is true.
Truth By Reason uses confidence and probability because many important claims are not honestly handled by pretending everything is either absolutely certain or completely unknowable.